|
Peter Putzer
Member since:
09 January 2008
Posts: 15
|
Friday 30 March 2007 1:05:48 am
|
|
|
Xavier Dutoit
Member since:
09 January 2008
Posts: 37
|
Monday 02 April 2007 5:51:58 am
Hi, did you receive our emails about it ?
Let's share again:
Each svn projects are separate svn repositories. I'm not familiar with eclipse, but you can download all the xmlwash project as a single project (from the normal svn client).
and kristof added:
I haven't used Eclipse and Subclipse that much so I'm definitely not an expert. It would be an annoying limitation if Subclipse doesn't allow you to checkout the root of the repository. Maybe Xavier can restructure the repository (with branches: trunk, releases, ...) to workaround this limitation.
Cheers
Kristof
(consulted resources: http://svn.collab.net/subclipse/h...oc/html/gettingstarted/checkout.html )
Does it help ? Do you want me to move it to trunk ?
X+
|
|
|
Peter Putzer
Member since:
09 January 2008
Posts: 15
|
Monday 02 April 2007 6:43:33 am
Hi,
I didn't receive any emails from either of you. But it did work with the SVN Repository Exploring perspective (not sure why "import from SVN checkout" did not work). I've checked in a first version of the 'teaser' operator that can be configured via the ezxml.ini.append.php file. Currently there is no documentation to speak of.
Future additions would be:
* Complete configurability via parameters (currently only maxlength and fuzzyness can be set as template operator parameters, everything else can only be changed in the .ini).
* Handle the case where a block level tag ends just before the "..." would be inserted. Currently, block level tags are handled if the text is cut before the closing element, but not if it is inserted just outside (which will break most layouts):
|
|
|
Xavier Dutoit
Member since:
09 January 2008
Posts: 37
|
Tuesday 05 June 2007 8:02:41 am
Repeat after me: do not put custom javascript in a xml field ;)
X+
|
|
|
Peter Putzer
Member since:
09 January 2008
Posts: 15
|
Thursday 07 June 2007 12:28:06 pm
Oh, sure, it's not in the user input in the XML field, rather it is generated by my image embedding templates.
|
|
|
Xavier Dutoit
Member since:
09 January 2008
Posts: 37
|
Sunday 10 June 2007 1:29:45 am
Hi,
Ok, I don' have this problem as I'm a big fan of not messing the content with js code.
What I'd do in a case like you is to simply put a class "funkydowatever" (name optional ;) on the image
Then, with jquery, add the behaviour on the class $jQuery(".funcydowatever").click(function() { alert("I do a funky alert"); } ); (function optional)
X+
|
|
|
Peter Putzer
Member since:
09 January 2008
Posts: 15
|
Sunday 10 June 2007 3:25:33 am
Yes, but that's not possible in this case - I'm calling a function with parameters that are specific to each image and cannot be reconstructed from tag attributes.
|
|
|
Xavier Dutoit
Member since:
09 January 2008
Posts: 37
|
Friday 22 June 2007 9:50:27 am
Well, one of the common non obstructive javascript tricks is to have semantically complex classes name, eg:
<img class="optimal_ratio-28 duration-12s "... > (not sure what you want to do, but you get the idea ;)
X+
|
|
