Path

projects / org / ezproject2010 / ngmemcachemutex / forum / general / difference vs. using ezfs2...

difference vs. using ezfs2 cluster file handler?

You need to be logged in to post messages in the forums. New users may register here.

Gaetano Giunta

Member since:
09 January 2008

Posts: 152

Monday 10 May 2010 8:20:25 am

As you probably know, the ezfs2 cluster file handler does not use mutexes any more.

Did you test it for comparison against this new solution?
Up

Stéphane Couzinier

Member since:
10 January 2008

Posts: 10

Tuesday 11 May 2010 5:49:00 am

Hi

I think ezfs2 fix all mutex bugs (with or without NAS).
Next step should be ezMemCacheFS ;-), just a small handler to add content cache in memcache or maybe something better use any NoSQL system (cassandra, mongodb etc etc).

http://www.kouz-cooking.fr
Up

Ivo Lukac

Member since:
09 January 2008

Posts: 19

Thursday 20 May 2010 1:56:57 am

@Gaetano When we implemented this solution ezfs2 was not an option for some reason I can't remember now (it had some bugs or similar problems). Currently I don't have resources for comparing, though it would be very interesting to do. Maybe someone from community gives it a try.

@Stéphane Cache based on memcache would be excellent, and it shouldn't be hard to implement as we have ezcomponents module as a base http://ezcomponents.org/docs/api/latest/introduction_Cache.html

http://www.linkedin.com/in/ivolukac
http://www.netgen.hr/eng/blog
http://twitter.com/ilukac
Up

You need to be logged in to post messages in the forums. New users may register here.